Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
rrwoods wrote:So the beer cans come closest, but everyone else screaming "GAWD my country already does this" doesn't make any sense to me. Most of the stuff that's been posted is nowhere close to the concept presented in the comic.

foobar2 wrote:Somebody already beat you to it -- there have been generic foods with exactly that sort of label for decades; I remember them from childhood. Google "generic food" in Google's "Images" category and have a look.
Misnomer wrote:http://www.comparestoreprices.co.uk/images/sa/sainsburys-basics-white-grated-cheese-500g-.jpg
God knows what type of cheese it actually is...
Michael.K wrote:The brilliant thing is that Loblaw[s] created two house brands: "No Name" yellow label generic, and premium house-brand "President's Choice" (or "PC"). No Name says, "I'm cheap", and PC says, "Yeah, but not that damn cheap".
Sort of like WalMart and Target.


amicus wrote:Hah! You're just a kid... the black-lettering-on-white generics were an 80s thing, back when there was a "recession," which younger folk may not appreciate
We ran into Murray Jay Siskind at the supermarket. His basket held generic food and drink, nonbrand items in plain white packages with simple labeling. There was a white can labeled CANNED PEACHES. There was a white package of bacon without a plastic window for viewing a representative slice. A jar of roasted nuts had a white wrapper bearing the words IRREGULAR PEANUTS. Murray kept nodding to Babette as I introduced them.
"This is the new austerity," he said. "Flavorless packaging. It appeals to me. I feel I'm not only saving money but contributing to some kind of spiritual consensus. Its like World War III. Everything is white. They'll take our bright colors away and use them in the war effort."
kd7dvd wrote:This was tried sometime back in the '80s. The chain's house brand went away and was replaced by this generic labeling. The text was Navy blue on white and was a little wordier than this.
I vividly remember the COOKING OIL label. It said, "Suitable for most household purposes; may be reused a limited number of times."
(The label didn't have a website, though. Also, I may have inserted that semicolon where there was none before...)
The experiment didn't work too well. I know *my* mom didn't buy the generic cooking oil, anyway. Couple of years later, they restarted the house brand.
FalseProphet wrote:Actually, it's the reverse. Most No Frills/No Name/generic brands are actually higher-end brands with simplified packaging. It's a form of price discrimination: the distributors know that higher income shoppers will buy the name brand, but lower income shoppers will balk at the inflated price. So they sell the same product as generic. Same principle as generic drugs.

not the XKCD Rob wrote:One thing I really don't like about shopping in general is this type of confusion: I need hand cream, but why are there so many kinds at different prices? Or I just want to buy a pen-- a pen, for crying out loud-- and the store has literally dozens of styles of pen in stock. Why the #$@% should I have to make a decision beyond the color?! I have walked out of stores empty-handed because I felt literally offended at being overwhelmed.
It's not that I don't like variety. It's the kind of variety that is the issue. If you don't believe me, try buying jeans, or trousers in general, with a 37-inch waist. Either buy from Lands' End or get them bespoke. Ditto a 39-inch waist. Or try buying an alarm clock... that shows the time in 24-hour format. Go to IKEA or give up. (I live in the suburbs in the northeastern US.) Or buy an analog calendar watch that actually has the day of the week change at midnight!!! Or an RPN calculator with stack height greater than 4. I might as well have unicorn flesh on my shopping list!
tonykilt wrote:This works for me instantly because I grew up in Ottawa and recognize that this has been done already in almost exactly the same way except with yellow instead of white packaging (and a bit less purism when it comes to the small print):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Name_%28brand%29
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch& ... brand+logo
In fact this touched home so exactly to my youth back in Ontario that I registered just to comment. From the text it sounds like Randall came up with the idea without ever knowing that someone did essentially exactly what he was proposing and created a well known brand for themselves with the idea decades ago. :-T
Tony O' the Kilt
addams wrote:tonykilt wrote:This works for me instantly because I grew up in Ottawa and recognize that this has been done already in almost exactly the same way except with yellow instead of white packaging (and a bit less purism when it comes to the small print):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Name_%28brand%29
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch& ... brand+logo
In fact this touched home so exactly to my youth back in Ontario that I registered just to comment. From the text it sounds like Randall came up with the idea without ever knowing that someone did essentially exactly what he was proposing and created a well known brand for themselves with the idea decades ago. :-T
Tony O' the Kilt
So, funny. The article says that the people developed a brand loyalty to the no brand.
Humans. We are so Human!
Virus of the Mind by Brodie is a book that is so good at explaining this phenomena.
http://www.amazon.com/Virus-Mind-New-Sc ... 0963600125
No. I don't think that you should buy a copy. I read it. It was good.
6 euros? Plus shipping? I paid a lot more than that for my copy.
No. I do not have my copy anymore. Gave it to a California Girl that was passing through on her way back to New Zealand.
*************
If, you settled this argument a few pages back, then, ignore this.
Karilyn wrote:False Prophet is right. It's definitely true that the low end products are often identical to a high end brand, with a different package. The only problem goes when the generic happens to be based on a high end brand that you don't like. A common one is Ketchup. Generic Ketchup is usually Hunts, not Heinz, and some people don't like Hunts. Another one is Peanut Butter, one of the few things I buy non-generic. Generic peanut butter is usually Jif or Skippy, both of which I don't like because they are too sweet and too salty, I always pick up Peter Pan as one of the few non-generics I buy.
If you're familiar with a variety of name brands, it's often not hard to figure out which name brand your generic actually is.
I was so happy when stores started carrying generic Miracle Whip. You have to keep an close eye to figure out which ones are Mayo (usually Heilman's equivalent) and which are Miracle Whip, considering they are both frequently labeled generically as Salad Dressing (who puts miracle whip or mayo on their salad?)
You seem to be contradicting yourself. If the generics are the same as the high-end brands, then why are you saying that the ketchup, penut butter, miracle whip and whatever aren't as good as the high-end brands? I guess what you're saying is that generics are often the same as the cheapest name brands. Generic ketchup is the same as (the cheaper ketchup) Hunts, generic peanut butter is the same as (the cheaper peanut butter) Jif, etc.
For the most part, you're probably right there -- if you're going to buy Hunts, you may as well save an extra penny and buy Walmart brand or whatever.
FalseProphet, however, was suggesting that the no-frills brands were actually putting the same product as the higher-end brands into their packages. While I agree that Walmart ketchup probably tastes like Hunts ketchup, I haven't seen any evidence that they're getting them from the same factory.
*********
Not all, but, some of the products are exactly the same product. Canned vegies and fruits are an example.
1. The same fields grow the product.
2. The same human workers do the manual portions of the job.
3. The same machinery is used to package the product.
3.a.) The machinery has minor adjustments that must be made between brands.
3.a.)1. The kind of can.
3.a.)2. The way the can is sealed.
3.a.) 3 The Label.
Same stuff. Different price.
The men and women do not get more money to package the high end stuff.
Who gets that money? Well; The smart people. Right?
Yeah. I have experience.
Labels are fun. Sometimes it has so little to do with what is in the box. It is all about the box. Maxwell Parish boxes are more valuable than anything that was ever sold in one.
https://www.google.com/search?q=maxwell ... 47&bih=339
Well; The Hope Diamond in a Maxwell Parish box would leave a person with a problem. Keep them both.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hope_Diamond
Or; Better yet; Give them to a museum.
I had a Maxwell Parish. The artist himself touched that thing. It was, just, a thing.
They are still making prints of his work. Right?
The man was good.
I did not like all of his art. Contentment. I had Contentment. I used it every day.
http://www.google.com/imgres?um=1&hl=en ... vAQ&zoom=1
I have no idea what the above link links to. Good luck and keep the children and Science Majors protected.
He did the artwork for some consumer goods, way back in the day.
The box was important. Still is.
jpk wrote:addams wrote:tonykilt wrote:This works for me instantly because I grew up in Ottawa and recognize that this has been done already in almost exactly the same way except with yellow instead of white packaging (and a bit less purism when it comes to the small print):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Name_%28brand%29
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch& ... brand+logo
In fact this touched home so exactly to my youth back in Ontario that I registered just to comment. From the text it sounds like Randall came up with the idea without ever knowing that someone did essentially exactly what he was proposing and created a well known brand for themselves with the idea decades ago. :-T
Tony O' the Kilt
So, funny. The article says that the people developed a brand loyalty to the no brand.
Humans. We are so Human!
Virus of the Mind by Brodie is a book that is so good at explaining this phenomena.
http://www.amazon.com/Virus-Mind-New-Sc ... 0963600125
No. I don't think that you should buy a copy. I read it. It was good.
6 euros? Plus shipping? I paid a lot more than that for my copy.
No. I do not have my copy anymore. Gave it to a California Girl that was passing through on her way back to New Zealand.
*************
If, you settled this argument a few pages back, then, ignore this.
Karilyn wrote:False Prophet is right. It's definitely true that the low end products are often identical to a high end brand, with a different package. The only problem goes when the generic happens to be based on a high end brand that you don't like. A common one is Ketchup. Generic Ketchup is usually Hunts, not Heinz, and some people don't like Hunts. Another one is Peanut Butter, one of the few things I buy non-generic. Generic peanut butter is usually Jif or Skippy, both of which I don't like because they are too sweet and too salty, I always pick up Peter Pan as one of the few non-generics I buy.
If you're familiar with a variety of name brands, it's often not hard to figure out which name brand your generic actually is.
I was so happy when stores started carrying generic Miracle Whip. You have to keep an close eye to figure out which ones are Mayo (usually Heilman's equivalent) and which are Miracle Whip, considering they are both frequently labeled generically as Salad Dressing (who puts miracle whip or mayo on their salad?)
You seem to be contradicting yourself. If the generics are the same as the high-end brands, then why are you saying that the ketchup, penut butter, miracle whip and whatever aren't as good as the high-end brands? I guess what you're saying is that generics are often the same as the cheapest name brands. Generic ketchup is the same as (the cheaper ketchup) Hunts, generic peanut butter is the same as (the cheaper peanut butter) Jif, etc.
For the most part, you're probably right there -- if you're going to buy Hunts, you may as well save an extra penny and buy Walmart brand or whatever.
FalseProphet, however, was suggesting that the no-frills brands were actually putting the same product as the higher-end brands into their packages. While I agree that Walmart ketchup probably tastes like Hunts ketchup, I haven't seen any evidence that they're getting them from the same factory.
*********
Not all, but, some of the products are exactly the same product. Canned vegies and fruits are an example.
1. The same fields grow the product.
2. The same human workers do the manual portions of the job.
3. The same machinery is used to package the product.
3.a.) The machinery has minor adjustments that must be made between brands.
3.a.)1. The kind of can.
3.a.)2. The way the can is sealed.
3.a.) 3 The Label.
Same stuff. Different price.
The men and women do not get more money to package the high end stuff.
Who gets that money? Well; The smart people. Right?
Yeah. I have experience.
Labels are fun. Sometimes it has so little to do with what is in the box. It is all about the box. Maxwell Parish boxes are more valuable than anything that was ever sold in one.
https://www.google.com/search?q=maxwell ... 47&bih=339
Well; The Hope Diamond in a Maxwell Parish box would leave a person with a problem. Keep them both.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hope_Diamond
Or; Better yet; Give them to a museum.
I had a Maxwell Parish. The artist himself touched that thing. It was, just, a thing.
They are still making prints of his work. Right?
The man was good.
I did not like all of his art. Contentment. I had Contentment. I used it every day.
http://www.google.com/imgres?um=1&hl=en ... vAQ&zoom=1
I have no idea what the above link links to. Good luck and keep the children and Science Majors protected.
He did the artwork for some consumer goods, way back in the day.
The box was important. Still is.
I just had to respond to this to say that I was unable to make myself read this post. No matter what I did, I couldn't focus on it, my eyes just sort of slid off it. You should really get a job in espionage, this is a perfect method of steganography.
frezik wrote:Anti-photons move at the speed of dark
DemonDeluxe wrote:Paying to have laws written that allow you to do what you want, is a lot cheaper than paying off the judge every time you want to get away with something shady.
pyeastman11 wrote:In the 1970s in Maine, there was an actual store brand that did this exact thing. Unfortunately, the quality was also crap and people stopped buying it.
jpk wrote:pyeastman11 wrote:In the 1970s in Maine, there was an actual store brand that did this exact thing. Unfortunately, the quality was also crap and people stopped buying it.
What, sold generic 'shrooms?
frezik wrote:Anti-photons move at the speed of dark
DemonDeluxe wrote:Paying to have laws written that allow you to do what you want, is a lot cheaper than paying off the judge every time you want to get away with something shady.
not the XKCD Rob wrote:This whole thread is about a concept which for me is rather emotionally charged.
Perhaps because of my Asperger syndrome, I become easily overwhelmed. Also, I have a rather short attention span for things such as grocery stores, and I have a very low tolerance for what I consider stupid behavior.
I don't give a damn about name brands. I shop at ALDI because they don't use gimmicks (beyond the prices ending in "9"). No coupons, no loyalty cards or similar crap. I might have seen a "buy one, get one XX% off" type deal once or twice, but that's about the limit of it. And the prices are low and the food seems to me as good as, if not better than, what I find at other grocery stores in my area.
One thing I really don't like about shopping in general is this type of confusion: I need hand cream, but why are there so many kinds at different prices? Or I just want to buy a pen-- a pen, for crying out loud-- and the store has literally dozens of styles of pen in stock. Why the #$@% should I have to make a decision beyond the color?! I have walked out of stores empty-handed because I felt literally offended at being overwhelmed.
It's not that I don't like variety. It's the kind of variety that is the issue. If you don't believe me, try buying jeans, or trousers in general, with a 37-inch waist. Either buy from Lands' End or get them bespoke. Ditto a 39-inch waist.
susanisausername wrote:Can you please make a shirt like this? White, and then in black it just says "shirt" on it. Or, you know, other merchandise like that.
Return to Individual XKCD Comic Threads
Users browsing this forum: abranosib, Angelastic, DavidRa, HES, MobTeeseboose, Sciscitor, Tide and 31 guests