Getting laid

For the discussion of language mechanics, grammar, vocabulary, trends, and other such linguistic topics, in english and other languages.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

Getting laid

Postby Chaosboye » Mon May 09, 2011 2:38 am UTC

Now, my English teacher once told me that in the past tense, lay is used when not connected to an object, laid with an object. However, we say "I got laid." laid is not connected to an object here, like in "I laid my back on the grass", so I thought it was incorrect. Am I right or wrong? Either way, could someone explain why we say gettin laid instead of gettin lay?
Chaosboye
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 2:32 am UTC

Re: Getting laid

Postby gmalivuk » Mon May 09, 2011 3:35 am UTC

Chaosboye wrote:we say "I got laid." laid is not connected to an object here
Yes it is. "Get laid" is a passive construction, like "get paid". If I say that Jake got paid yesterday, then it means someone paid Jake (i.e. Jake is the object of that action).

Of course, there's also the fact that "get laid" is an idiom that doesn't use quite the usual sense of "lay", so we shouldn't expect it to follow all the same rules as in formal academic English. (After all, would you say someone got laid in a school paper or business letter?)
In the future, there will be a global network of billions of adding machines.... One of the primary uses of this network will be to transport moving pictures of lesbian sex by pretending they are made out of numbers.
Spoiler:
gmss1 gmss2
User avatar
gmalivuk
Archduke Vendredi of Skellington the Third, Esquire
 
Posts: 19298
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here, There, Everywhere (near Boston, anyway)

Re: Getting laid

Postby ZLVT » Tue May 10, 2011 4:05 am UTC

When the verb is intransitive (e.g I lie on the bed) it goes lie; lay; have lain. When it's transitive (I lay the book down) it goes lay; laid; have laid (remember it goes like say said said). The verb lie is very similar to lay and people often confuse the two but they are two distinct verbs.

the problem is that the rule would be better stated saying that the conjugation pattern is lay laid laid if the verb has a patient. since in english passive constructs reverse subject and object.
In this case you use lay (laid) because as gmalivuk said get laid is passive and thus uses the past participle not past tense. Get is often used in passives as a synonym for be or become, try exchanging them to see whether it still works.
In passive setntences, the object of the active form (patient) now becomes the subject. This means passive constructs can only be used with transitive verbs. so when your teacher said it has to have an object, from the active verb standpoint "I got laid" or rather "I was laid (by her)" has an object, namely "I" -> "She laid me (down on the bed)". But when you don't want to specify the agent you turn the patient into a subject and make everything passive.

*agent: nouns doing the action; patient: noun suffering the action
22/♂/hetero/atheist/★☭/Image

Originator of the DIY ASL tags
User avatar
ZLVT
 
Posts: 1448
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:56 pm UTC
Location: Canberra, Australia


Return to Language/Linguistics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests