News in brief

Seen something interesting in the news or on the intertubes? Discuss it here.

Moderators: Zamfir, Hawknc, Moderators General, Prelates

User avatar
CorruptUser
Posts: 8595
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:12 pm UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby CorruptUser » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:22 am UTC

elasto wrote:but it seems to me that something like calculus is a more appropriate skill to be taught at degree level rather than in high school - ie. once it's known it will be directly useful to your career.

I'd way prefer that high school focus on real-life useful skills like, I dunno, the power of compound interest to make you rich or poor, or how to fact-check political arguments.


And most people will never use the things they learn in Earth Science/Geology, Chemistry, Biology, etc, and arguably less often than Calculus. Might as well extend that to History, English (sadly), Music, Art, and so on. But we still teach those things, because at 14 years old people don't know what they want to do, and should be given a basic education in a wide variety of subjects just in case.


And if I was dictator of Earth, I'd ship all the useless office drones into space, but only after I have one engineer develop a self-sanitizing phone.

User avatar
Zamfir
I built a novelty castle, the irony was lost on some.
Posts: 7266
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:43 pm UTC
Location: Nederland

Re: News in brief

Postby Zamfir » Mon Jan 16, 2017 7:57 am UTC

The discussion is getting out of the topic ("News in brief"), but it would be awfully late to get started on calculus for the first time not until you are a freshman in uni.

I that really true though, or more true than for other topics? Calculus seems to have a fairly unique position among high school subjects.
- Quite a lot of time and effort is spent on it, especially in higher tracks
- It's a useful tool, more than general knowledge. The existence and the very basics of calculus might be considered general knowledge, but there's a lot of math that seems just as relevant in that regard
- It's very specific. If you don't move on to certain careers, you'll never use the tool
- the above holds across a surprisingly wide range of countries and education systems

elasto
Posts: 3065
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 1:53 am UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby elasto » Mon Jan 16, 2017 8:03 am UTC

CorruptUser wrote:And most people will never use the things they learn in Earth Science/Geology, Chemistry, Biology, etc, and arguably less often than Calculus. Might as well extend that to History, English (sadly), Music, Art, and so on.

Agreed. A lot of the detail could be trimmed from those subjects too. People should be learning core principles, not rote memorising facts which then get forgotten the day after the exam.

But we still teach those things, because at 14 years old people don't know what they want to do, and should be given a basic education in a wide variety of subjects just in case.

I agree we should give a basic education in a variety of subjects. Just apparently we disagree about the definition of 'basic'.

I think school should be less about cramming in facts and obscure skills, and more about learning how to learn.

Also, I agree that 14yo is too young for people know what they want to do, but I disagree that the answer therefore is to teach them everything. I think a much better answer is lifelong free academic education - people should be allowed to learn anything at any time.

We all live 11 lives

(As Zamfir says, let's leave the discussion here now. We should open a new thread if we want to discuss it in further detail)

User avatar
Zamfir
I built a novelty castle, the irony was lost on some.
Posts: 7266
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:43 pm UTC
Location: Nederland

Re: News in brief

Postby Zamfir » Mon Jan 16, 2017 9:23 am UTC

http://echochamber.me/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=121277#p4134115
I made a continuation thread for the education topics.

User avatar
ahammel
My Little Cabbage
Posts: 2135
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:46 am UTC
Location: Vancouver BC
Contact:

Re: News in brief

Postby ahammel » Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:34 pm UTC

He/Him/His/Alex
God damn these electric sex pants!

User avatar
Liri
Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
Posts: 798
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: News in brief

Postby Liri » Wed Jan 18, 2017 4:11 pm UTC

This is cool.

UFOs! Secret psychic experiments! Invisible ink!
kalira wrote:But your own butt is always in the past, because it's behind you.

User avatar
pogrmman
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:53 pm UTC
Location: Probably outside

Re: News in brief

Postby pogrmman » Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:59 pm UTC

The Gambia is being invaded by a troops backed by Senegal, Nigeria, and Ghana to enforce the results of an election conducted at the end of last year.

The winner of said election was sworn in today in Dhaka in Senegal.

Supposedly, the leader of The Gambia's army doesn't want to fight back.

User avatar
HES
Posts: 4745
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 7:13 pm UTC
Location: England

Re: News in brief

Postby HES » Fri Jan 20, 2017 1:07 am UTC

I wouldn't really use the word "invade". A new president was elected, UN backed security forces are removing the old president from power. The only resistance is likely to be from the former president's elite guard.
He/Him/His Image

User avatar
pogrmman
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:53 pm UTC
Location: Probably outside

Re: News in brief

Postby pogrmman » Fri Jan 20, 2017 2:44 am UTC

HES wrote:I wouldn't really use the word "invade". A new president was elected, UN backed security forces are removing the old president from power. The only resistance is likely to be from the former president's elite guard.


I'd still use "invasion" -- they are entering the territory of another nation. Yes, they aren't really going to face resistance, but I'd still classify it as such.

User avatar
sardia
Posts: 5716
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:39 am UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby sardia » Fri Jan 20, 2017 3:10 am UTC

pogrmman wrote:
HES wrote:I wouldn't really use the word "invade". A new president was elected, UN backed security forces are removing the old president from power. The only resistance is likely to be from the former president's elite guard.


I'd still use "invasion" -- they are entering the territory of another nation. Yes, they aren't really going to face resistance, but I'd still classify it as such.

I'd only call it an invasion if they lose.

User avatar
HES
Posts: 4745
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 7:13 pm UTC
Location: England

Re: News in brief

Postby HES » Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:16 am UTC

pogrmman wrote:I'd still use "invasion" -- they are entering the territory of another nation. Yes, they aren't really going to face resistance, but I'd still classify it as such.

It's not so much the resistance part, as the "with support of the legitimate president" part. But it's semantics really, you can justify use of the term.
He/Him/His Image

elasto
Posts: 3065
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 1:53 am UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby elasto » Fri Jan 20, 2017 12:30 pm UTC

ahammel wrote:Obama has commuted Chelsea Manning's sentence. She'll be out in May.

The Guardian wrote:On Thursday Obama cut short the prison terms of 330 people, the majority of whom were convicted of federal drug crimes.

During the president’s second term, he exercised his presidential power to grant clemency liberally, particularly for those convicted of nonviolent drug crimes. In addition to raising Obama’s total tally of sentences shortened, Thursday’s flood of commutations is the most any US president has issued in a single day.

Obama has commuted more people’s sentences than the last 13 presidents combined, according to the White House. In total, Obama commuted the sentences of 1,715 people, include more than 560 who were serving life sentences.

Obama has also pardoned 212 people during his time in office, the White House said.

I think Obama was a well-intentioned and thoroughly decent person, but just not as good at the political game as some - probably because he lacked the ruthless edge that you need to get results.

Trump clearly has that ruthlessness, but the same political machinery that dulled Obama's good intentions will hopefully also blunt Trump's worst excesses...

User avatar
pogrmman
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:53 pm UTC
Location: Probably outside

Re: News in brief

Postby pogrmman » Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:43 pm UTC


User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine.
Posts: 5627
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/[St. Kitts and] Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: News in brief

Postby Angua » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:05 pm UTC

pogrmman wrote:They've found people alive after the avalanche in Italy. 20 people are still missing, 4 are dead.

They lit a fire under a collapsed section of roof to stay warm.

That's great news.
'Look, sir, I know Angua. She's not the useless type. She doesn't stand there and scream helplessly. She makes other people do that.'
GNU Terry Pratchett

User avatar
Thesh
Made to Fuck Dinosaurs
Posts: 5387
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:55 am UTC
Location: Colorado

Re: News in brief

Postby Thesh » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:06 pm UTC

You might want to narrow your quote a little.
Honesty replaced by greed, they gave us the reason to fight and bleed
They try to torch our faith and hope, spit at our presence and detest our goals

Mambrino
Posts: 388
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:45 pm UTC
Location: No we don't have polar bears. Except in zoos.

Re: News in brief

Postby Mambrino » Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:03 am UTC


User avatar
sardia
Posts: 5716
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:39 am UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby sardia » Thu Jan 26, 2017 7:43 pm UTC

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/techn ... urity.html
Trumps phone is unsecure, and risks being compromised. Hackers could turn on his camera and microphone and record his every conversation. Republicans haven't commented on this lapse in security standards.

I think this story is a little early to blame the Republicans for hypocrisy. Yes it's a risk, but other stories need time to develop. Yes the Republicans are hypocrites, but I don't think they even know Twitter is a security risk.

User avatar
WibblyWobbly
Can't Get No
Posts: 506
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 1:03 pm UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby WibblyWobbly » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:28 pm UTC

Doomsday Clock at 2.5 min to midnight.

Take that for what you will - overly political or less alarmed than they should be? First time it's been moved a non-integer number of minutes, and the second-closest it's been to midnight since 1953, I think. That was just US/USSR H-bomb tests, though. The half-minute is apparently because Trump is just getting started, so there's room for growth (shrinkage?) in our future. Well, if the apocalypse does come, we can rest assured it will be the best, most effective apocalypse anyone has ever seen. I mean, some people think the Permian-Triassic extinction was a big deal, but America is going to make it look like a mild cough. Sad.

Or something. I'm just rambling right now.

User avatar
ucim
Posts: 5428
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 3:23 pm UTC
Location: The One True Thread

Re: News in brief

Postby ucim » Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:33 am UTC

sardia wrote:Trumps phone is unsecure, and risks being compromised. Hackers could turn on his camera and microphone and record his every conversation.
I don't see the problem. It's not a private server. [/sarcasm]

Jose
Order of the Sillies, Honoris Causam - bestowed by charlie_grumbles on NP 859 * OTTscar winner: Wordsmith - bestowed by yappobiscuts and the OTT on NP 1832 * Ecclesiastical Calendar of the Order of the Holy Contradiction * Please help addams if you can. She needs all of us.

User avatar
sardia
Posts: 5716
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:39 am UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby sardia » Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:49 am UTC

ucim wrote:
sardia wrote:Trumps phone is unsecure, and risks being compromised. Hackers could turn on his camera and microphone and record his every conversation.
I don't see the problem. It's not a private server. [/sarcasm]

Jose

We know Trump is a hypocrite, that's not whose opinions matters here. We want to pick off wavering Republicans who don't like most of what Trump stands for. Or at this rate, we'd settle for people who really don't like one thing Trump stands for. This could be it, but unless Republicans find out about it, and react correctly (outrage/mad but not blase or ignoring it), then it won't matter. The trick is to pick something that will outrage vulnerable Republicans voters in swing districts. It's just a matter of finding the right thing.

Tyndmyr
Posts: 10119
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:38 pm UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby Tyndmyr » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:04 am UTC

sardia wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/technology/donald-trump-phone-social-media-security.html
Trumps phone is unsecure, and risks being compromised. Hackers could turn on his camera and microphone and record his every conversation. Republicans haven't commented on this lapse in security standards.

I think this story is a little early to blame the Republicans for hypocrisy. Yes it's a risk, but other stories need time to develop. Yes the Republicans are hypocrites, but I don't think they even know Twitter is a security risk.


Obama's phone had the same issue, he didn't wanna swap, so they tricked him out with a custom, secured version. http://money.cnn.com/2014/05/22/technology/security/nsa-obama-blackberry/

I presume something similar will be done for Trump. Seems like...a lot of money for just one phone, I guess, but yknow, president.

User avatar
Zohar
COMMANDER PORN
Posts: 7420
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:45 pm UTC
Location: NY

Re: News in brief

Postby Zohar » Wed Feb 08, 2017 1:54 pm UTC

It's a more modern world and the president needs to be more connected. I'm not bothered with the NSA spending more money on giving the president better tools to manage his life, that's to be expected. The same needs to be done for Trump, but until there's a satisfactory solution, he needs to use the existing one that's already been approved - ditch his phone, switch to Obama's blackberry.
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."

Not how I say my name

User avatar
Liri
Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
Posts: 798
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: News in brief

Postby Liri » Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:47 am UTC

kalira wrote:But your own butt is always in the past, because it's behind you.

ObsessoMom
Nespresso Bomb
Posts: 441
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:28 pm UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby ObsessoMom » Mon Jul 24, 2017 3:22 pm UTC

Relief may be a bit premature, according to an article in The Economist from a few days ago, which expected the veto to be overridden and noted other depressing developments:

The Economist wrote:On July 12th PiS stepped up its effort to subjugate the legal system to politicians’ control with two new laws. Members of the National Judicial Council, the body that chooses judges, will henceforth be selected by parliament instead of by other judges. The minister of justice can now appoint and dismiss the heads of lower courts. A third bill, if signed into law, would allow the minister to sack every member of the Supreme Court. Among other responsibilities, that court rules on the validity of elections. Unexpectedly, Andrzej Duda, Poland’s president, threatened to veto the bill, but with a few amendments it is now likely to pass.


But yeah, the veto is better than nothing.

Edited to say: Oh! I see! You're reporting that President Duda has now bucked his party to veto two of the three bills, instead of only one. Okay, I'll be a little more hopeful.

morriswalters
Posts: 6860
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:21 am UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby morriswalters » Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:48 pm UTC


User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2299
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: News in brief

Postby Soupspoon » Sun Jul 30, 2017 10:26 pm UTC

morriswalters wrote:Placing humans at center of computer optimization yields hot plasmas. It makes a point interesting to me.

Interesting. But I don't think using the example of bicycle design as something necessarily done well by humans. (Also, a sub-version of that device was made back in the '80s, so nothing new under the sun!) But that's not to say that I don't find it interesting. I wonder if anyone's thought to use the Amazon Mechanical Turk for anything quite like that?

morriswalters
Posts: 6860
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:21 am UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby morriswalters » Sun Jul 30, 2017 11:36 pm UTC

I have no idea. I'd hadn't ever thought about it in that way. :o

ObsessoMom
Nespresso Bomb
Posts: 441
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:28 pm UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby ObsessoMom » Tue Aug 01, 2017 1:02 am UTC

Former Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio Is Convicted of Criminal Contempt (for continuing, in defiance of a court order, to instruct his officers to racially profile people, i.e. to detain Latinos solely because of an officer's suspicion that they might be undocumented immigrants)

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2299
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: News in brief

Postby Soupspoon » Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:54 pm UTC

I'm standing by the newspapers in a shop.

The Daily Telegraph headline: Statins 'needlessly doled out to millions' - Statins are being needlessly prescribed to millions of people because of their age, the Royal College of GPs has warned. …several more paragraphs

Daily Express headline: MORE PATIENTS SHOULD BE GIVEN STATINS - Doctors should offer statins to almost every man over 60 and all women over 75. // A new study reveals that if drugTurn to page 6

(I don't want to spoil it by reading either story, you know... Life is stressful enough!)

Mutex
Posts: 969
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:32 pm UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby Mutex » Tue Aug 01, 2017 4:43 pm UTC

Also statins both cause and cure cancer.

ObsessoMom
Nespresso Bomb
Posts: 441
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:28 pm UTC

Re: News in brief

Postby ObsessoMom » Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:09 pm UTC

Singapore has its first female president (Halimah Yacob) with no election required, because a committee of senior officials determined that only one presidential candidate met the country's new requirements.

The Economist wrote:In November the government duly changed the constitution to reserve presidential elections for members of a particular ethnic group if no one from that group has held the job for the previous five terms. On this basis, the presidential election this year was limited to Malays, who make up 13% of the population but have not held the office of president since 1970. [...C]andidates for president this year had to be Malay, [but] not just any Malay could apply. They also needed either to have served in an extremely senior government job or to have run a profitable company with S$500m ($371m) in shareholder equity. The figure used to be S$100m but a decision to raise the bar was announced last year. Undaunted, two other Malays beside Ms Halimah applied to run, but were judged not to have met the criteria.

Popular and competent, Ms Halimah seemed very likely to win even with some competition. Disqualifying her challengers robs her of the modicum of legitimacy the election could have given her. Voters excited to mark ballots for Singapore’s first female president are particularly disappointed. Then again, Singapore’s repeated tightening of the rules suggests a lack of faith that voters, given a wider choice, would make the right decision.


full story

User avatar
orthogon
Posts: 2605
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

Re: News in brief

Postby orthogon » Thu Sep 14, 2017 7:42 am UTC

ObsessoMom wrote:
Singapore’s repeated tightening of the rules suggests a lack of faith that voters, given a wider choice, would make the right decision.

It's hard not to sympathise.

(About voters in general; no slur intended on the Singaporean electorate in particular).
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.


Return to “News & Articles”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ivnja, ucim and 13 guests