Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
Ratclaw wrote:Williamager kind of said what I was thinking. How much do you lose with just a close friendship compared to a romance (besides the obvious)? You have companionship, affection, and so on. You have to decide whether the things that go with a relationship mean that much to you.
Seriously, being rejected by a good friend doesn't mean "everything is ruined forever" with that person. Try to trust me.
somdude04 wrote:Also, now that I'm dating her, I realize in each of those past relationships, I was settling a bit. Sure, they were fun to be around and attractive, and occasionally might be interested in a video game or something, but me and my girlfriend just... fit.

mackereth wrote:He might be a jerk, but he does have hair...
I had a friend once who told me that she fantasised about all of her friends. She was a little taken aback, I think, when my only reaction was "Oh? How was I?"
She declined to answer, though, damnit.
aleflamedyud wrote:Dude. Randall's been reading Reddit too much. Sure, we've all heard of the Internet Nice Guy, but in my experience if you're going to develop a crush on a friend they generally start out as a genuine friend rather than a repressed crush.
Relationships are like stem cells. You have to direct them towards being what you want, or they become something else entirely.
Waffles wrote:Also, people tend to think that if they declare their hopeful intentions, that the friendship is lost. Not necessarily true. The way its brought up and the way the aftermath is handled makes all the difference. Not saying that every situation can end up well, but you're not going to lose the good friend just for saying 'hey, could a relationship work here? I'm interested in you in that vein, I've cared about you a lot for a long time. No? Alright, then I'll do my best to move that interest elsewhere so it doesn't make our friendship too wierd.'
Seriously, being rejected by a good friend doesn't mean "everything is ruined forever" with that person. Try to trust me.
imnotnickvito wrote:The "friends" scenario is particularly painful to us nerds, we who seldom deal with people, much less those of the opposite sex. And when we nerds reflect on our situation to rectify this state of affairs, the best we can come up with is something like Ladder Theory, which has the effect of justifying and intensifying our self-pity while doing nothing to help us attract women.
Now the good news....
Attracting women is learnable, teachable, practicable, perfectible skill.
Just PLEASE, for the love of God, DON'T ask an attractive girl to teach you how to attract women. It's not their thing. Look for advice from guys who actually do it day in, day out.
Contrabass wrote:This is basically the story of my semester.
reaver121 wrote:I agree that being a 'nice guy' and abusing an emotional vulnerable moment only to have sex with the girl is being a total jerk-ass but if it is for a relationship I am not entirely sure. I always figured that girlfriend = very good friend you fall in love with. It seems logical to first to get to know a girl as a friend, then ask her out if you develop feelings for her and move into a relationship. If it doesn't work out, you can go back to good friends (if possible off course). If you don't want to be her friend, how can you expect to be her boyfriend ?
Reading the reactions in this thread & the fact that I have absolutely have no experience whatsoever with women relationship-wise, it seems that the above view is wrong somewhere. Care to explain ?
stormoftara wrote:Gee Willikers
That guy who was my best friend for three years, who was always there for me, especially when I had a bad breakup, who later dated me.
THIS WAS HIS PLAN.
I miss his friendship.
Some Asshole wrote:He's a Level 12 Paladin with 18 Charisma and 79 hitpoints!
EDIT:reaver121 wrote:I agree that being a 'nice guy' and abusing an emotional vulnerable moment only to have sex with the girl is being a total jerk-ass but if it is for a relationship I am not entirely sure. I always figured that girlfriend = very good friend you fall in love with. It seems logical to first to get to know a girl as a friend, then ask her out if you develop feelings for her and move into a relationship. If it doesn't work out, you can go back to good friends (if possible off course). If you don't want to be her friend, how can you expect to be her boyfriend ?
Reading the reactions in this thread & the fact that I have absolutely have no experience whatsoever with women relationship-wise, it seems that the above view is wrong somewhere. Care to explain ?
My limited experience is that a natural progression from friend to lover is like every medicine ever advertised: not for everyone and extremely fucking dangerous for some.
I guess it depends on the people. Some girls probably prefer you take it slow. Some probably prefer you just bend her backwards over the desk in the back office and friends can come later.
I know that probably doesn't help, but emotions and logic rarely mix.
Flewellyn wrote:Really, the whole problem with the "friends with detriments" approach is that it's dishonest. I find it works better to just honestly, straightforwardly say to someone "I'm attracted to you, what do you say?" Then if they say "no thanks" for whatever reason, pursuing an honest friendship is still possible. On the other hand, if they say "yes", you can actually pursue a romantic relationship without any deceit, and one that can actually work out well because it's an honest relationship.
Yes, occasionally, two people who have been friends for a long time can develop romantic feelings for each other, but this only works if they're...wait for it...HONEST with each other.
There's a big difference between what you describe and the comic: the guy in the comic has already developed feelings for her but isn't asking her out. He's being dishonest, pretending he wants to be "just friends" when really he wants to date her and is too chicken to say so.reaver121 wrote:I agree that being a 'nice guy' and abusing an emotional vulnerable moment only to have sex with the girl is being a total jerk-ass but if it is for a relationship I am not entirely sure. I always figured that girlfriend = very good friend you fall in love with. It seems logical to first to get to know a girl as a friend, then ask her out if you develop feelings for her and move into a relationship. If it doesn't work out, you can go back to good friends (if possible off course). If you don't want to be her friend, how can you expect to be her boyfriend ?
Reading the reactions in this thread & the fact that I have absolutely have no experience whatsoever with women relationship-wise, it seems that the above view is wrong somewhere. Care to explain ?
videogamesizzle wrote:so, uh, seen any good arbitrary, high numbers lately?
reaver121 wrote:I agree that being a 'nice guy' and abusing an emotional vulnerable moment only to have sex with the girl is being a total jerk-ass but if it is for a relationship I am not entirely sure. I always figured that girlfriend = very good friend you fall in love with. It seems logical to first to get to know a girl as a friend, then ask her out if you develop feelings for her and move into a relationship. If it doesn't work out, you can go back to good friends (if possible off course). If you don't want to be her friend, how can you expect to be her boyfriend ?
Reading the reactions in this thread & the fact that I have absolutely have no experience whatsoever with women relationship-wise, it seems that the above view is wrong somewhere. Care to explain ?
lupp wrote:What the "Gee Willikers that guy is creepy" people are missing is that in real life he doesn't have the whole plan. It's just like girls don't actually say "I'm going to date this jerk". Only in this comic, and that's what's funny about it.
Actually, it's more "I like this girl. I'll be nice to her and let her get to know me. Maybe she will like me." The rest of the story just follows. He isn't trying to trap her in a relationship where she is not happy. He never intended to be dishonest. He just doesn't know how to show his interest in the right way.
lupp wrote:What the "Gee Willikers that guy is creepy" people are missing is that in real life he doesn't have the whole plan. It's just like girls don't actually say "I'm going to date this jerk". Only in this comic, and that's what's funny about it.
Actually, it's more "I like this girl. I'll be nice to her and let her get to know me. Maybe she will like me." The rest of the story just follows. He isn't trying to trap her in a relationship where she is not happy. He never intended to be dishonest. He just doesn't know how to show his interest in the right way.
'll never forget one day we were standing there and she had her phone in her back pocket, all of sudden it started vibrating and she goes, "Ohh, I'm vibrating," and after checking the message she looks at me and kind of winks saying, "But I don't need a vibrator, I've got a boyfriend."
cr08 wrote:In all reality, the creepy guys are the 'jerk' in the comic who put on the faux nice guy facade in order to garner attention from their objects of desire.
Domovoi wrote:'ll never forget one day we were standing there and she had her phone in her back pocket, all of sudden it started vibrating and she goes, "Ohh, I'm vibrating," and after checking the message she looks at me and kind of winks saying, "But I don't need a vibrator, I've got a boyfriend."
Obviously not a made up story at all. Especially because of the "we were standing there" part, which proves that this happened in a real, actual situation.
videogamesizzle wrote:so, uh, seen any good arbitrary, high numbers lately?
Some Asshole wrote:Just something else to add.
I can't seem to put everything down nice and neat while working at the same time, but also be aware of YOUR needs, too. If you need a friends-to-lovers thing (I do), then don't try to do business with a chick that needs the dude to - you guessed it - bend her sideways over that desk in the back office. Doesn't mean you can't be friends, and doesn't mean that it might not work out (what an awkward expression) years down the road. Just be aware of both her needs AND your needs.
cr08 wrote:reaver121 wrote:I agree that being a 'nice guy' and abusing an emotional vulnerable moment only to have sex with the girl is being a total jerk-ass but if it is for a relationship I am not entirely sure. I always figured that girlfriend = very good friend you fall in love with. It seems logical to first to get to know a girl as a friend, then ask her out if you develop feelings for her and move into a relationship. If it doesn't work out, you can go back to good friends (if possible off course). If you don't want to be her friend, how can you expect to be her boyfriend ?
Reading the reactions in this thread & the fact that I have absolutely have no experience whatsoever with women relationship-wise, it seems that the above view is wrong somewhere. Care to explain ?
I don't believe that viewpoint is wrong, in fact I believe it to be absolutely correct at least from a viewpoint of a person thinking clearly and logically and not with their crotch. To quote a friend of mine: 'There is no such thing as 'love at first sight'. It's simply a euphemism for lust.'
To put simply, your viewpoint should really be the defacto one for society in general but rarely ever is. Starting off as a friend actually gives you time to understand and get a feel for each others personalities, likes, stuff like that. So if it ever did develop into a relationship, it would be a natural progression and there'd be less opportunity for butting of heads. But if you end up jumping in head first in a fit of lust, I guarantee your personalities are going to clash and create major problems between you. At least as friends, it's easier to reconcile these differences without totally risking killing off the friendship.
Then again, that's just my observation, albeit a logical one.
edit: And as a 'here here!' to a previous poster: There's a HUGE difference between outright lust and love. And if you can't gather that difference in your head, you need to educate yourself imnsho.
reaver121 wrote:That's also the reason I always found 'Romeo & Juliet' a bit hypocritical. It wants to portray true love but Romeo falls in love with Juliet by just seeing her across the ballroom (in the version I saw anyway). For all he knows, she could be a raving psychopath.
reaver121 wrote:I'm the same. I have nothing against people who jump into a relationship 10 seconds after they meet the girl but it seems rather illogical and feels wrong to me somehow. That's also the reason I always found 'Romeo & Juliet' a bit hypocritical. It wants to portray true love but Romeo falls in love with Juliet by just seeing her across the ballroom (in the version I saw anyway). For all he knows, she could be a raving psychopath.
videogamesizzle wrote:so, uh, seen any good arbitrary, high numbers lately?
Return to Individual XKCD Comic Threads
Users browsing this forum: da Doctah, Flotter, Klear, lmjb1964, MobTeeseboose, mscha, Rule110, rvloon and 42 guests