1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

cheweytoo
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:38 am UTC

1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby cheweytoo » Wed Jan 10, 2018 4:38 pm UTC

Image

title text: "There's data suggesting that this model may apply to deep-dish/thin-crust pizza. I've designed a thorough multi-year study to investigate this personally, but funding organizations keep denying my grant requests."


This inflation certainly seems to apply to pizza sizes around here:
A "large pizza" is now routinely bigger than the plate it is being served on.
I'm not aware of any newly popular, smaller, pizza-replacing food item though…

richP
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:28 pm UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby richP » Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:10 pm UTC

My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!

User avatar
moody7277
Posts: 570
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:06 pm UTC
Location: Extreme south Texas

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby moody7277 » Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:37 pm UTC

richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!


Shame you're not an astronomer, they're used to axes going in weird directions.

On the pizza front, one wonders if the popularity of Detroit style pizza indicates we're at the end of branch 1 on the graph.
The story of my life in xkcdmafia:

Tigerlion wrote:Well, I imagine as the game progresses, various people will be getting moody.

User avatar
cellocgw
Posts: 1915
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:40 pm UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby cellocgw » Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:50 pm UTC

richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!


Naah, it's just a minor variation on waterfall and swimlane graphs. You must not be up on the latest Software Efficiency Methodologies(TM)
https://app.box.com/witthoftresume
Former OTTer
Vote cellocgw for President 2020. #ScienceintheWhiteHouse http://cellocgw.wordpress.com
"The Planck length is 3.81779e-33 picas." -- keithl
" Earth weighs almost exactly π milliJupiters" -- what-if #146, note 7

User avatar
orthogon
Posts: 2936
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby orthogon » Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:53 pm UTC

richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!

I won't mention that panini is the plural, then. *twitch*

This phenomenon seems to run counter to shrinkflation, which affects goods sold in shops, as opposed to restaurants. Perhaps because you notice the size whilst you're still in the restaurant?

ETA Inb4: Yes, yes, panini is the plural in Italian, whilst in English, panini is singular. Descriptivism, etc. I just haven't let this one go yet. (I read an amusing column once, which said "'The spaghetti were delicious'? I don't think so.")

ETA2: Actually, spaghetti isn't as egregious, because it's Italian plural -> English mass noun, not Italian plural -> English singular. Italians would rarely have cause to refer to an individual spaghetto, whereas a panino is presumably a commonly ordered thing. But perhaps Italians never eat alone...
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

RickLeePhoto
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:51 pm UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby RickLeePhoto » Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:53 pm UTC

Also applies to cars.

Hiferator
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:23 am UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Hiferator » Wed Jan 10, 2018 6:24 pm UTC

There was a similar development with laptop screen sizes and "subnotebooks" that snuck in between netbooks and ever growing notebooks.

User avatar
Pfhorrest
Posts: 4795
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:11 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Pfhorrest » Wed Jan 10, 2018 6:26 pm UTC

What I don't understand is the cell phone size trends.

I remember when tiny phones were what all the kids wanted. Smaller phones were better.

Now, bigger phones are better, and kids talk on tablets larger than their heads.

What caused the reversal?
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy) - The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)

Hiferator
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:23 am UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Hiferator » Wed Jan 10, 2018 6:29 pm UTC

Pfhorrest wrote:What caused the reversal?


The ability/desire to display things other than numbers and contact names.

But yes, some phablets are ridiculous.

User avatar
orthogon
Posts: 2936
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby orthogon » Wed Jan 10, 2018 6:30 pm UTC

Pfhorrest wrote:What I don't understand is the cell phone size trends.

I remember when tiny phones were what all the kids wanted. Smaller phones were better.

Now, bigger phones are better, and kids talk on tablets larger than their heads.

What caused the reversal?

Smartphones. The small ones were great for phone calls, but sucked for doing the internets. Also, the kids that liked the small ones are now the square-oid parents of the ones carrying the Dom Jolly phones. Fashion was ever thus. (Edit: ninja'ed)
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

ChakatFirepaw
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 8:22 pm UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby ChakatFirepaw » Wed Jan 10, 2018 6:51 pm UTC

orthogon wrote:
richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!

I won't mention that panini is the plural, then. *twitch*

This phenomenon seems to run counter to shrinkflation, which affects goods sold in shops, as opposed to restaurants. Perhaps because you notice the size whilst you're still in the restaurant?


This trend applies more to singular food items that are the focus of the sale rather than 'bulk' items.

You can see shrinkflation in things like the McDonald's fry cycle:

They have regular and large.
Then regular, a slightly smaller large and supersize.
Then small, an again slightly smaller large and a not quite so supersize.
Then small, medium and a slightly larger than we started large.
Then back to regular and large.

User avatar
Reka
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:21 pm UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Reka » Wed Jan 10, 2018 7:06 pm UTC

There's gotta be something like this going on with the concentrations of detergents, too. Otherwise, we'd have doubled the strength of detergent so many times by now that it'd dissolve its container and be classified as a hazardous substance. Or something.

Godsguy
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:10 pm UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Godsguy » Wed Jan 10, 2018 7:18 pm UTC

Hiferator wrote:
Pfhorrest wrote:What caused the reversal?


The ability/desire to display things other than numbers and contact names.

But yes, some phablets are ridiculous.



Porn. Just say it. We (hetrosexual men) want to (sterotyipcally) see bigger boobies.
There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worth doing as simply messing around in boats - Ken Grahame (Wind in the Willows)

User avatar
Kewangji
Has Been Touched
Posts: 2242
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:20 pm UTC
Location: Lost in Translation
Contact:

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Kewangji » Wed Jan 10, 2018 7:42 pm UTC

This discussion reminds me that one time at 3AM at a tennis/club event (don't ask me why I was there) where the visitors outnumbered the population, my glucose levels were dangerously low and I encountered the only open sandwich shop in town, where I was sold a measly panino with nothing on it for the equivalent of about 15 dollars.
If you like my words sign up for my newsletter, Airport Tattoo Parlour: https://tinyletter.com/distantstations

The Great Hippo wrote:Nuclear bombs are like potato chips, you can't stop after just *one*

User avatar
somitomi
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:21 pm UTC
Location: can be found in Hungary
Contact:

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby somitomi » Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:00 pm UTC

Hiferator wrote:But yes, some phablets are ridiculous.

The word "phablet" itself is ridiculous. Which, along with the emergence of things that are both laptops and tablets is why someday I will come up with a shorthand for "portable computer" and will use it for everything from smartphones to laptops from that day.
orthogon wrote:talians would rarely have cause to refer to an individual spaghetto, whereas a panino is presumably a commonly ordered thing. But perhaps Italians never eat alone...

What, do Italians never take an individual spaghetto out of the pack to chew it while cooking the rest of their pasta?
—◯-◯

User avatar
yakkoTDI
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 4:02 pm UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby yakkoTDI » Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:08 pm UTC

somitomi wrote:
orthogon wrote:talians would rarely have cause to refer to an individual spaghetto, whereas a panino is presumably a commonly ordered thing. But perhaps Italians never eat alone...

What, do Italians never take an individual spaghetto out of the pack to chew it while cooking the rest of their pasta?


What kind of crazy person ever does this?


/me hides half chewed spaghetto

User avatar
Kewangji
Has Been Touched
Posts: 2242
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:20 pm UTC
Location: Lost in Translation
Contact:

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Kewangji » Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:09 pm UTC

somitomi wrote:The word "phablet" itself is ridiculous. Which, along with the emergence of things that are both laptops and tablets is why someday I will come up with a shorthand for "portable computer" and will use it for everything from smartphones to laptops from that day.

French has "portable" for this, if I'm not mistaken.
If you like my words sign up for my newsletter, Airport Tattoo Parlour: https://tinyletter.com/distantstations

The Great Hippo wrote:Nuclear bombs are like potato chips, you can't stop after just *one*

sonar1313
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:29 am UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby sonar1313 » Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:20 pm UTC

cheweytoo wrote:I'm not aware of any newly popular, smaller, pizza-replacing food item though…


That would be a calzone.

Either that or it's time for those frozen pizza roll-up things to make a comeback.

rmsgrey
Posts: 3408
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby rmsgrey » Wed Jan 10, 2018 8:50 pm UTC

orthogon wrote:This phenomenon seems to run counter to shrinkflation, which affects goods sold in shops, as opposed to restaurants. Perhaps because you notice the size whilst you're still in the restaurant?


A couple of examples of shrinkflation I've noticed particularly in the last year or two:

Toblerones with missing teeth.

Jaffa cakes have started appearing in packs of 10 rather than 12.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3488
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Soupspoon » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:22 pm UTC

somitomi wrote:someday I will come up with a shorthand for "portable computer" and will use it for everything from smartphones to laptops from that day.

P.C.

8-)

User avatar
da Doctah
Posts: 891
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:27 am UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby da Doctah » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:46 pm UTC

orthogon wrote:
richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!

I won't mention that panini is the plural, then. *twitch*

This phenomenon seems to run counter to shrinkflation, which affects goods sold in shops, as opposed to restaurants. Perhaps because you notice the size whilst you're still in the restaurant?

ETA Inb4: Yes, yes, panini is the plural in Italian, whilst in English, panini is singular. Descriptivism, etc. I just haven't let this one go yet. (I read an amusing column once, which said "'The spaghetti were delicious'? I don't think so.")

ETA2: Actually, spaghetti isn't as egregious, because it's Italian plural -> English mass noun, not Italian plural -> English singular. Italians would rarely have cause to refer to an individual spaghetto, whereas a panino is presumably a commonly ordered thing. But perhaps Italians never eat alone...


Just popping in here to point out that the singular of tamales is not, as usually thought, tamale. It's tamal. Get it right, hombres.

User avatar
measure
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2015 4:31 pm UTC
Location: Time-traveling kayak

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby measure » Wed Jan 10, 2018 10:18 pm UTC

somitomi wrote:
Hiferator wrote:But yes, some phablets are ridiculous.

The word "phablet" itself is ridiculous.

I can't not see "phallic tablet". Now neither can you. You're welcome.

User avatar
Pfhorrest
Posts: 4795
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:11 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Pfhorrest » Wed Jan 10, 2018 10:31 pm UTC

"Mobile device" seems to be the catch-all for term for "portable computer" in Business English, and in British English "mobile" is already short for "mobile phone", so I vote we just start calling all mobile information and communication devices (including mobile phones, tablets, laptops, etc) "mobiles".

Or we could say "portutor". Your call.
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy) - The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)

User avatar
Steve the Pocket
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:02 am UTC
Location: Going downtuuu in a Luleelurah!

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Steve the Pocket » Wed Jan 10, 2018 10:46 pm UTC

"Too large to eat comfortably", and the illustration of a Dagwood accompanying it, is putting it mildly. More like, "so overstuffed that you can't even pick it up without half the ingredients spilling onto the plate." I got a chicken po' boy from Sheetz one time because I had a coupon, and I had to pick out about half the chicken with a fork before I was confident that I could handle it. The gyros from EuroGyro have issues too.

I never got involved with the Great Sandwich Debate of 2017, but my favorite "definition" of a sandwich was something like "anything I can pick up and eat with my bare hands while playing cards with my fellow nobles in the Hellfire Club." This means anything too big to pick up, even with two hands, or too soaked through to keep my hands clean, is disqualified.

I'll make an exception if you want to explicitly call something a "knife and fork sandwich", because at least you're being honest even if it's kind of cheating.
cephalopod9 wrote:Only on Xkcd can you start a topic involving Hitler and people spend the better part of half a dozen pages arguing about the quality of Operating Systems.

Baige.

User avatar
freezeblade
Posts: 1254
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:11 pm UTC
Location: Oakland

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby freezeblade » Wed Jan 10, 2018 11:00 pm UTC

Steve the Pocket wrote:I'll make an exception if you want to explicitly call something a "knife and fork sandwich", because at least you're being honest even if it's kind of cheating.


or "Open Face Sandwich?"
Belial wrote:I am not even in the same country code as "the mood for this shit."

User avatar
StClair
Posts: 404
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:07 am UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby StClair » Thu Jan 11, 2018 1:31 am UTC

moody7277 wrote:
richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!


Shame you're not an astronomer, they're used to axes going in weird directions.


Speaking of, am I the only one who looked at this and thought of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram?

User avatar
Eternal Density
Posts: 5547
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 12:37 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 1940: "A hotdog is a taco"

Postby Eternal Density » Thu Jan 11, 2018 2:24 am UTC

RickLeePhoto wrote:Also applies to cars.

Hey, that's what I came here to say!
Play the game of Time! castle.chirpingmustard.com Hotdog Vending Supplier But what is this?
In the Marvel vs. DC film-making war, we're all winners.

User avatar
pogrmman
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:53 pm UTC
Location: Probably outside

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby pogrmman » Thu Jan 11, 2018 3:10 am UTC

StClair wrote:
moody7277 wrote:
richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!


Shame you're not an astronomer, they're used to axes going in weird directions.


Speaking of, am I the only one who looked at this and thought of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram?


You're not.

User avatar
orthogon
Posts: 2936
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby orthogon » Thu Jan 11, 2018 9:51 am UTC

yakkoTDI wrote:
somitomi wrote:
orthogon wrote:talians would rarely have cause to refer to an individual spaghetto, whereas a panino is presumably a commonly ordered thing. But perhaps Italians never eat alone...

What, do Italians never take an individual spaghetto out of the pack to chew it while cooking the rest of their pasta?


What kind of crazy person ever does this?


/me hides half chewed spaghetto

I thought I was alone! Thing is, you do this when you're extremely hungry, and it's utterly unsatisfying. The dry pasta is just too hard, and unpleasantly so, rather than nicely crunchy. If you suck for long enough, the outside goes a bit soft and starchy whilst the inside remains hard. And it has no flavour. It's an act of desperation, like drinking seawater. And yet, I still do it.

(Is dry pasta even a thing in Italy?)
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

User avatar
stopmadnessnow
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:58 pm UTC
Location: Somewhere in that country with Big Ben in it.

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby stopmadnessnow » Thu Jan 11, 2018 10:48 am UTC

What about those giant bourbon biscuits and custard creams? I can't see them being popular. For once, I think the usual size will be the best. Wagon Wheels for one became smaller.

I'm not sure which cookies you have in the US.
For comic writing or short story writing post-haste, contact the off-the peg joke chap. He has the nous.
http://plwimsett.simplesite.com/ for my site.
https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~01110048bacb43eae6 to hire me at Upwork.

jpers36
Posts: 223
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:47 pm UTC
Location: The 3-manifold described by Red and Blue

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby jpers36 » Thu Jan 11, 2018 1:20 pm UTC

I think someone's been reading The Innovator's Dilemma.


Image

User avatar
Wee Red Bird
Posts: 183
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:50 am UTC
Location: In a tree

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Wee Red Bird » Thu Jan 11, 2018 1:24 pm UTC

Soupspoon wrote:
somitomi wrote:someday I will come up with a shorthand for "portable computer" and will use it for everything from smartphones to laptops from that day.

P.C.

8-)

"What's a computer?" - Annoying kid in an Apple advert shortly before being beaten to death with the keyboard attached to her iPad

User avatar
GlassHouses
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 12:41 pm UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby GlassHouses » Thu Jan 11, 2018 3:17 pm UTC

RickLeePhoto wrote:Also applies to cars.


As in "Jay Leno owns several Ferrari" vs. "my dentist just bought a Ferraro"...

Speaking of cars, I used to own a 1980 VW Golf, the one that was sold as the Rabbit in the U.S., i.e. the first series. According to a Wikipedia, the basic model of that series weighed 790 kg, while the basic model of the current series (the seventh) weighs 1351 kg, a 71% increase. How much bigger will it have to get before they start to feel the need to introduce a new, smaller model in their lineup?

Eoink
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:33 pm UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Eoink » Thu Jan 11, 2018 3:38 pm UTC

GlassHouses wrote:
RickLeePhoto wrote:Also applies to cars.


As in "Jay Leno owns several Ferrari" vs. "my dentist just bought a Ferraro"...

Speaking of cars, I used to own a 1980 VW Golf, the one that was sold as the Rabbit in the U.S., i.e. the first series. According to a Wikipedia, the basic model of that series weighed 790 kg, while the basic model of the current series (the seventh) weighs 1351 kg, a 71% increase. How much bigger will it have to get before they start to feel the need to introduce a new, smaller model in their lineup?


If my quick Google is accurate, the VW Polo now weighs >1,000kg, so the model down is already larger than your early Golf. Indeed even the Up starts at >900kg, I wonder if a lot of that is down to safety measures.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3488
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Soupspoon » Thu Jan 11, 2018 3:46 pm UTC

GlassHouses wrote:Speaking of cars, I used to own a 1980 VW Golf, the one that was sold as the Rabbit in the U.S., i.e. the first series. According to a Wikipedia, the basic model of that series weighed 790 kg, while the basic model of the current series (the seventh) weighs 1351 kg, a 71% increase. How much bigger will it have to get before they start to feel the need to introduce a new, smaller model in their lineup?

Mini, classic and new…
Spoiler:
Image

User avatar
orthogon
Posts: 2936
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby orthogon » Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:24 pm UTC

jpers36 wrote:I think someone's been reading The Innovator's Dilemma.


Image

I can kind of see the point, but that chart really fails to make it. The solid blue and green arrows are parallel, so on the face of it the "Disruptive Offering" is always going to be worse than the "Established Offering". In practice the latter will probably plateau, allowing the former to overtake it, but the chart doesn't show that. Also, "by Conventionally Measure"?

GlassHouses wrote:
RickLeePhoto wrote:Also applies to cars.


According to a Wikipedia, the basic model of that series weighed 790 kg, while the basic model of the current [VW Golf]series (the seventh) weighs 1351 kg, a 71% increase. How much bigger will it have to get before they start to feel the need to introduce a new, smaller model in their lineup?

There's definitely size inflation, but AIUI a lot of the weight increase in cars, particularly since the VW Beatle/Mini Cooper/2CV days is down to things like Side Impact Protection, which was introduced in the 80s/90s. It's basically metal armour, and has a weight to match. Safety features take all the fun out of motoring...
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

jpers36
Posts: 223
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:47 pm UTC
Location: The 3-manifold described by Red and Blue

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby jpers36 » Thu Jan 11, 2018 9:57 pm UTC

orthogon wrote:
jpers36 wrote:I think someone's been reading The Innovator's Dilemma.


Image

I can kind of see the point, but that chart really fails to make it. The solid blue and green arrows are parallel, so on the face of it the "Disruptive Offering" is always going to be worse than the "Established Offering". In practice the latter will probably plateau, allowing the former to overtake it, but the chart doesn't show that. Also, "by Conventionally Measure"?


Ignore the chart flaws, I did a quick image search.

The disruptive offering is always going to be less functional by old standards than the established offering, but that will be offset by the disruptive offering being both less costly and usable in unforeseen ways. This brings a new market for the technology type. As the functionality of both offerings increase, the marginal utility of the established offering offers less actual value than the alternative benefits of the disruptive offering.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Innovator%27s_Dilemma

richP
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:28 pm UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby richP » Fri Jan 12, 2018 12:18 am UTC

somitomi wrote:The word "phablet" itself is ridiculous. Which, along with the emergence of things that are both laptops and tablets is why someday I will come up with a shorthand for "portable computer" and will use it for everything from smartphones to laptops from that day.

computini?
computo?
Sorry, I'm still stuck on the panini discussion, I guess...

User avatar
GlassHouses
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 12:41 pm UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby GlassHouses » Fri Jan 12, 2018 1:26 am UTC

orthogon wrote:
GlassHouses wrote:
RickLeePhoto wrote:Also applies to cars.

According to a Wikipedia, the basic model of that series weighed 790 kg, while the basic model of the current [VW Golf]series (the seventh) weighs 1351 kg, a 71% increase. How much bigger will it have to get before they start to feel the need to introduce a new, smaller model in their lineup?

There's definitely size inflation, but AIUI a lot of the weight increase in cars, particularly since the VW Beatle/Mini Cooper/2CV days is down to things like Side Impact Protection, which was introduced in the 80s/90s. It's basically metal armour, and has a weight to match. Safety features take all the fun out of motoring...


The side impact protection and airbags and whatnot must have made a difference, but I'm not sure it's a significant factor compared to the overall size inflation.
Wikipedia only provides weight information for four out of the seven Golf series, but the resulting graph (of the low-end models vs. year of initial release) looks remarkably straight:

golf-weight.png

User avatar
Cougar Allen
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 4:49 am UTC

Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Postby Cougar Allen » Fri Jan 12, 2018 2:50 am UTC

cheweytoo wrote:This inflation certainly seems to apply to pizza sizes around here:
A "large pizza" is now routinely bigger than the plate it is being served on.
I'm not aware of any newly popular, smaller, pizza-replacing food item though…

They sell pizza by the slice nowadays.


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests