In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
I mean the most common definition is whether or not they could reproduce with each other. I have seen some novel of the same genre defining them as different race and be able to mate, so I see it's accurate.
- Angua
- Don't call her Delphine.
- Posts: 5852
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
- Location: UK/[St. Kitts and] Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Technically, their offspring need to be able to reproduce as well. Horses and donkeys are not the same species, but you can still get mules.
Crabtree's bludgeon: “no set of mutually inconsistent observations can exist for which some human intellect cannot conceive a coherent explanation, however complicated”
GNU Terry Pratchett
- Liri
- Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
- Contact:
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
There can also be geographically separated species that have viable, fertile offspring when they reproduce together, but they're still considered separate species because the two populations aren't naturally reproducing with each other.
There's a certain amount of freedom involved in cycling: you're self-propelled and decide exactly where to go. If you see something that catches your eye to the left, you can veer off there, which isn't so easy in a car, and you can't cover as much ground walking.
- Angua
- Don't call her Delphine.
- Posts: 5852
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
- Location: UK/[St. Kitts and] Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Are they not subspecies?
Crabtree's bludgeon: “no set of mutually inconsistent observations can exist for which some human intellect cannot conceive a coherent explanation, however complicated”
GNU Terry Pratchett
- Liri
- Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
- Contact:
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Oftentimes not. "What is a species?" is a question with a bajillion answers, same with "what is a subspecies?"
There's a certain amount of freedom involved in cycling: you're self-propelled and decide exactly where to go. If you see something that catches your eye to the left, you can veer off there, which isn't so easy in a car, and you can't cover as much ground walking.
- Soupspoon
- You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
- Posts: 3878
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
- Location: 53-1
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Typhoon, Ohio, Vanguard..Liri wrote:same with "what is a subspecies?"

(But, actually, the concept of Ring Species confuses things, too.)
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
So in this case, what would they be called? Variant?
- Liri
- Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
- Contact:
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
You can use whichever term you want, honestly. Biologists do. If you want it to be scientific, don't use "race" though.
There's a certain amount of freedom involved in cycling: you're self-propelled and decide exactly where to go. If you see something that catches your eye to the left, you can veer off there, which isn't so easy in a car, and you can't cover as much ground walking.
-
- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 3:15 pm UTC
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
I asked my microbiology teacher for a definition of species and he could not give me one.
Any definition based on reproduction immediately faces problems because many species reproduce solely asexually. I came up with the idea that any two organisms whose DNA differs by <X, where X is a constant generally accepted by the scientific community, are part of the same species. The problem I realized is that this means that there is no Transitive Property of Species (a term I just coined), which is really weird in its implications.
Any definition based on reproduction immediately faces problems because many species reproduce solely asexually. I came up with the idea that any two organisms whose DNA differs by <X, where X is a constant generally accepted by the scientific community, are part of the same species. The problem I realized is that this means that there is no Transitive Property of Species (a term I just coined), which is really weird in its implications.
"You are not running off with Cow-Skull Man Dracula Skeletor!"
-Socrates
-Socrates
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
There are literally dozens of definitions of species, depending on which scientist is talking and in what area of biology. This gives a good summary (and is a great show you should watch).
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."
Not how I say my name
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."
Not how I say my name
- Liri
- Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
- Contact:
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Zohar wrote:There are literally dozens of definitions of species, depending on which scientist is talking and in what area of biology. This gives a good summary (and is a great show you should watch).
I prefer my earlier "bajillion"
There's a certain amount of freedom involved in cycling: you're self-propelled and decide exactly where to go. If you see something that catches your eye to the left, you can veer off there, which isn't so easy in a car, and you can't cover as much ground walking.
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
So, in our many scientific interpreptation, what would that particular situation fall into(s)?
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Meh? Whatever suits the story I'm guessing you're trying to write?
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."
Not how I say my name
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."
Not how I say my name
- Xanthir
- My HERO!!!
- Posts: 5366
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:49 am UTC
- Location: The Googleplex
- Contact:
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Yeah, we've answered your surface question ("yes, no, or maybe, depending on which definition of 'species' you're using, because there are a lot of them"). Since you're still asking, that means there's a question behind your question that you're really trying to answer. Ask that one directly.
(I suspect your actual question is "in my fantasy world, do scientists call them the same species or different?", which we can't answer - you have to decide that.)
(I suspect your actual question is "in my fantasy world, do scientists call them the same species or different?", which we can't answer - you have to decide that.)
(defun fibs (n &optional (a 1) (b 1)) (take n (unfold '+ a b)))
- Angua
- Don't call her Delphine.
- Posts: 5852
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
- Location: UK/[St. Kitts and] Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Consider the question - are Vulcans the same species as human?
Crabtree's bludgeon: “no set of mutually inconsistent observations can exist for which some human intellect cannot conceive a coherent explanation, however complicated”
GNU Terry Pratchett
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Angua wrote:Consider the question - are Vulcans the same species as human?
Clearly not. I define species based on the colour of their blood.
In most fiction, anything that resembles a human can reproduce with humans. Demons, or even tentacle monsters, are clearly not the same species as the humans who bear their children. Most people know it's biologically wrong, but it's typical enough in many stories that any attempt to shine a light on it in your fiction is likely to get more sarcastic "okay, thank you for breaking my suspension of disbelief" reactions than "whoa, that's deep" reactions.
The biggest number (63 quintillion googols in debt)
-
- Posts: 7073
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:21 am UTC
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
There is something about this question that give me shivers.
in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Soupspoon wrote:(But, actually, the concept of Ring Species confuses things, too.)
That article says
"The textbook examples of ring species, including the circumpolar herring gull complex, the greenish warbler of Asia, and the Ensatina salamanders of America, have all been challenged, so ring species are at best rare."
.
Are there unambiguous current ring species (in addition to any which may have existed before, but don't anymore) ?
I found my old forum signature to be awkward, so I'm changing it to this until I pick a better one.
- gmalivuk
- GNU Terry Pratchett
- Posts: 26577
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
- Location: Here and There
- Contact:
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
No usable definition of species is going to be transitive, though. For every other thing that has ever lived on Earth, there's a chain of organisms connecting you to that thing, and each organism in the chain is considered to be the same species as the ones on either side of it.jewish_scientist wrote:I asked my microbiology teacher for a definition of species and he could not give me one.
Any definition based on reproduction immediately faces problems because many species reproduce solely asexually. I came up with the idea that any two organisms whose DNA differs by <X, where X is a constant generally accepted by the scientific community, are part of the same species. The problem I realized is that this means that there is no Transitive Property of Species (a term I just coined), which is really weird in its implications.
- Soupspoon
- You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
- Posts: 3878
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
- Location: 53-1
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
At best, one can suggest the temporal boundary of death of the Most Recent Common Ancestor (or perhaps Most Recent Breedable Cousins would be better1) as the emergent points of the "watersheds" between the streams of species that ultimately flow back and merge with the First Ancestor/whatever.
But good luck actually empirically testing and recording that to sufficient depth and width across the whole tree of life...
1 But accept the possibility that the first unbreedable nth cousins may yet beget n+kth cousins that have random genetic drift or allelle re-convergence sufficient to believably breed again, given both opportunity and inclination...
But good luck actually empirically testing and recording that to sufficient depth and width across the whole tree of life...
1 But accept the possibility that the first unbreedable nth cousins may yet beget n+kth cousins that have random genetic drift or allelle re-convergence sufficient to believably breed again, given both opportunity and inclination...
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Zohar wrote:Meh? Whatever suits the story I'm guessing you're trying to write?
Not really, just a bout of curiousity this time (though that would make an interesting concept, like magic is the great uniter of species or something...
Not really anymore question about this too, this is as direct as I could get.
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
Linguistics suffers from a similar issue (defining when two dialects become different languages, and indeed, what make two things different dialects in the first place) and, as a result, has often started using "variety" as a way of recovering a similar sense without establishing a level in a hierarchy. I think it's roughly equivalent to "taxon" in biology.
E.g. Cockney is a variety of English which is a variety of Anglo-Frisian which is a variety of Germanic which is a variety of Indo-European
Similarly in biology one could just start using "taxon" at all levels
E.g. humans are a taxon of primates which are a taxon of mammals which are a taxon of animals etc
This recovers transitivity and resolves the question of is the thing a subspecies or separate species but it still has issues with ring species (or similar things though) because with those the issue is that these things are fundamentally not discrete but can be a continuum (which is where the issues of ring species and dialect continua arise).
E.g. Cockney is a variety of English which is a variety of Anglo-Frisian which is a variety of Germanic which is a variety of Indo-European
Similarly in biology one could just start using "taxon" at all levels
E.g. humans are a taxon of primates which are a taxon of mammals which are a taxon of animals etc
This recovers transitivity and resolves the question of is the thing a subspecies or separate species but it still has issues with ring species (or similar things though) because with those the issue is that these things are fundamentally not discrete but can be a continuum (which is where the issues of ring species and dialect continua arise).
my pronouns are they
Magnanimous wrote:(fuck the macrons)
- Liri
- Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
- Contact:
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
"Phylon" is becoming the standard term as opposed to "taxon". Phylogeny incorporates evolution, taxonomy (traditionally) is about applying artificial tiers to the tree of life.
But yeah linguistics is similar.
But yeah linguistics is similar.
There's a certain amount of freedom involved in cycling: you're self-propelled and decide exactly where to go. If you see something that catches your eye to the left, you can veer off there, which isn't so easy in a car, and you can't cover as much ground walking.
- Quizatzhaderac
- Posts: 1656
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:28 pm UTC
- Location: Space Florida
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
I'd say the scientific answer would have to be: There's a lot of new stuff to consider, and we probably want to revise our classification system.
Do these different types of people originate from darwinian evolution? Lamarkian evolution? Created directly by the gods?
If the different races can interbreed, what's keeping them separate?
Do these different types of people originate from darwinian evolution? Lamarkian evolution? Created directly by the gods?
If the different races can interbreed, what's keeping them separate?
The thing about recursion problems is that they tend to contain other recursion problems.
- doogly
- Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
- Posts: 5493
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
- Location: Lexington, MA
- Contact:
Re: In scientific's definition, in a fantasy world would a beastman or an elf be considered the same species?
eSOANEM wrote:Linguistics suffers from a similar issue (defining when two dialects become different languages, and indeed, what make two things different dialects in the first place) and, as a result, has often started using "variety" as a way of recovering a similar sense without establishing a level in a hierarchy. I think it's roughly equivalent to "taxon" in biology.
But we do have a perfectly good distinction between a language and a dialect already - "a language is a dialect with an army."
Science, and the methods by which we reach a scientific consensus, are not so pure, extra especially when it comes to questions of demarcation. If you are writing a fantasy setting, there will surely be different groups that stand to benefit from the question being one way or another. Those supporting elf-suffrage may say they're all just samesies, the beastmen separatists may disagree. A scientist can be found who thinks anything you like, and they can be promoted and their thoughts propagated.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests