To be fair, it is certainly true that science reporting is overall pretty bad, and I don't think climate reporting is exempt from that. I just don't think that Gore is somehow especially bad, and in my experience, climate science reporting from left-leaning sources is often better than reporting on other fields, such as nutrition, medicine, astronomy, physics, and particularly evolution.
Right-leaning sources, however, have appallingly terrible reporting of climate science, to the point where it is simply dishonest. There is no comparison between the two.
For the discussion of the sciences. Physics problems, chemistry equations, biology weirdness, it all goes here.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests